C14 dating dinosaur bones, what exactly are we dating here? sample contamination and general trustworthyness
Because new carbon atoms will not replace original carbon atoms in the collagen molecule.
If a "recent" result was derived it would be universally challenged with possible risks of poor result claims for our laboratory. About Genesis Park The purpose of Genesis Park is to showcase the evidence that dinosaurs and man were created together and have co-existed throughout history.
The scientific community has now faslified its own supernova theory for the origin of elements heavier than iron. The threat hangs over everyone. Getting the same dates would help rule out contamination because the smaller bone will have a larger surface to volume ratio which, if contamination were a significant factor, should result in higher percentages of modern carbon.
However, Carboniferous coal was carefully extracted from deep within mines far below the layers containing dinosaur remains and fully sealed till lab analysis. They are reproduced below. This is recommended by a carbon-dating laboratory specialist. This means that carbon ages of specimens from past millennia and even from only centuries ago need to be adjusted downward.
That premise is surely incorrect. Dinosaur bone showing 5pmc means that five percent of the carbon in the bone needs to be replaced with modern carbon, which high level of contamination would very possibly be detectable.
The inventor of the radiocarbon dating method, Dr.
Fossils, however, form in sedimentary rock -- sediment quickly covers a dinosaur's body, and the sediment and the bones gradually turn into rock. Radiocarbon dating just helps us zero in on a more precise estimate. Our results clearly indicate the presence of both apatite and amide peaks within woven embryonic bone tissue, which should not be susceptible to microbial contamination or other post-mortem artefacts.
The half-life of carbon is only 5, years, so carbon dating is only effective on samples that are less than 50, years old.
"I beseech you, in the bowels of Christ, think it possible that you may be mistaken."
Merely giving the old-age assumption the benefit of the doubt, however, by assuming the lowest reasonable alkalinity and temperatures for the life of the specimen, retains amino acid racemization as a powerful tool for falsifying million and billion year dates, especially when combined with extant soft tissue and plentiful radiocarbon.
Further, more analysis should be done on relevant specimens excavated from uranium minescomparing their radiocarbon percentages to similar in type and estimated date specimens gathered away from uranium mines.
Call BS all you want. The team reported that they could not believe the artifacts were made in modern times, nor could they believe they were made by some amateur who tried to perpetuate a fraud. We then scrape the outer surface off to get rid of surface contamination, and date the inner remaining material.
As it turns out, Miller's research group obtained their sample in quite a remarkable way. In response to your references to an Alexander Cherkinsky article, separating diagenetic from bioapatite C14 dating dinosaur bones is only part of the problem. Published by RSR on Aug.
Both mathematical analysis of the data, and the nature of some of the specimens, indicate that contamination does not solve the radiocarbon problem for old-earth geologists. Also, we call on the news media and citizens everywhere to urge paleontologists, curators, university faculty, and government scientific agencies to encourage and support further testing for C content in dinosaur remains.
Consider then, the fossil remains of organisms that had lived near the surface but that have been long buried in ocean sediments. He dismounted and dug out of the ground the hewn stones as well as a few ceramic pieces.
Each of the clay pieces had been individually made, without molds, skillfully sculptured, and carefully decorated. Triceratops and Hadrosaur femur bones in excellent condition were discovered in Glendive Montana, and our group received permission to saw them in half and collect samples for Carbon testing.
In addition to work already done documenting appreciable 14c levels even in contamination-resistant specimens, we recommend a few experiments including a couple proposed by RSR friend David Willis: RSR predicts that even allegedly million-year-old amber will show significant quantities of modern carbon.
According to papers filed with the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, when Mark Armitage interviewed for an opening at CSUN for a "regular" "part-time" microscopist in he told the panel that he had published materials supportive of creationism.
And if the 14c came from contamination, for example, one would not expect the contamination to so equally affect the bioapatite and the collagen. In Novembera photo of the soft tissue in the triceratops horn was published on the cover of American Laboratory magazine.
Suddenly he spotted some partially exposed hewn stones and a ceramic object half buried in the dirt. These layers are like bookends -- they give a beginning C14 dating dinosaur bones an end to the period of time when the sedimentary rock formed.
However, it does not. A decade ago, a hot topic for debate was which came first, replication or metabolism?